Selecting the most reliable electricity supplier for Gol Gohar steel factories: ranking of power plants using multi-criteria decision-making methods

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Master of Industrial Engineering, Financial Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, College of Farabi, University of Tehran

3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology

4 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Industrial Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology

Abstract
With the increase in electricity consumption in the country over the last few years, despite the strategic nature of the steel industry in the country, the supply of electricity for steel companies has faced serious problems; In this study, we have first examined the strategies for improving the quality and increasing the production rate of Gol Gohar Steel Company through forming a SWOT matrix. Then, considering that sustainable electricity supply is identified as the key strategy to achieve this goal, using multi-criteria decision-making methods, different power plants are ranked for electricity supply of this company. For this purpose, using two main indicators of maintenance planning, i.e. reliability and availability, the options have been evaluated, and the ranking of power plants has been done using different methods: AHP, EDAS, TOPSIS, and MAUT. Also, for the weighting of criteria, two methods of forming a pairwise comparison matrix (PCM) and Shannon's method have been used. The results indicate that among the three power plants—Kahnouj, Goharan, and Samangan—the power supply from the Samangan power plant will be the most reliable for the Golgohar company. Specifically, in three out of four decision-making methods, the Samangan power plant was identified as the best option, while it ranked second in the remaining method. Additionally, the Kahnouj power plant and the Goharan power plant were identified as the second and third-best options, respectively.

Keywords

Subjects

لطفی، پوریا؛ ملکی، اکبر؛ شهرکی شهرآبادی، رضا و احمدی، محمدحسین.(1400). پتانسیل‌سنجی مزرعه‌های خورشیدی با روش‌های تصمیم‌گیری چندمعیاره در ایران. نشریه شیمی و مهندسی شیمی ایران، دوره 40، شماره 3.
منظوری، داوود منظوری و رحیمی، علیرضا. (1394). ‌اولویت‌بندی نیروگاه‌های تولید برق در ایران با استفاده از مدل‌های تصمیم‌گیری چندشاخصه. پژوهشنامه اقتصاد انرژی ایران، سال چهارم، شماره 14. https://doi.org/10.30488/gps.2019.85992
عباسی قله سرخ، رضا. (1398). شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی راهبردهای مؤثر در بهبود عملکرد زنجیره تأمین با استفاده از فرآیند تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی (AHP). هفتمین کنفرانس ملی رویکردهای نوین مدیریت، اقتصاد و حسابداری.
پورجواد، ساسان؛ خوشاب، سپیده؛ فرح‌گل، پوریا و رضایی، قاسم. (1400). ارزیابی عوامل ریسک زنجیره تأمین با استفاده از روش AHP فازی (مورد مطالعه: نیروگاه دالاهو). نشریه علمی آماد، دوره بیستم، شماره 79.
افشاریان، سوده؛ سهرابی، عادل و سهرابی، لیلا. (1400). رتبه‌بندی احداث برترین مزارع نیروگاه‌های بادی و خورشیدی با استفاده از روش AHP با در نظر گرفتن شاخص‌های اقتصادی و مالی ایران. فصلنامه علمی انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر و نو، سال هشتم، شماره اول، 55-48.
خلیفه سلطانی، سید رشید. (1400). استفاده از روش فرآیند تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی برای اولویت‌بندی میزان تأثیر واحدهای مختلف شرکت توزیع برق در زنجیره تأمین (مطالعه موردی شرکت توزیع برق یزد). دومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی چالش‌ها و راهکارهای نوین در مهندسی صنایع و مدیریت و حسابداری.
امیدیان، مجتبی و حیدریه، سید عبدالله. (1397). اولویت‌بندی راهبرد زنجیره تأمین در تولید برق به روش تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی فازی. دومین کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت و کسب و کار. 
Abbasi Qole Sorkh, Reza. (2019). Identifying and ranking effective strategies in improving supply chain performance using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Seventh National Conference on New Approaches to Management, Economics and Accounting. [In Persian]
Afsharian, Soudeh and Sohrabi Adel, Leila Sohrabi. (2021). Ranking the construction of the best wind and solar power plants using the AHP method, considering Iran's economic and financial indicators. Quarterly Journal of Renewable and New Energies, Year 8, Issue 1, pp. 48-55. [In Persian]
Atmaca, Ediz, and Hasan Burak Basar. Evaluation of power plants in Turkey using Analytic Network Process (ANP). Energy 44.1 (2012): 555-563.
Buket Karatop, Busra Taskan, Elanur Adar, Cemalettin Kubat.  Decision analysis related to the renewable energy investments in Turkey based on a Fuzzy AHP-EDAS-Fuzzy FMEA approach. Journal of Computers & Industrial Engineering 151 (2021) 106958
Garg, R. K., V. P. Agrawal, and V. K. Gupta. Coding, evaluation and selection of thermal power plants–A MADM approach. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 29.9 (2007): 657-668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2006.08.002
Khalifa Soltani, Seyed Rashid. (2021). Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Method to Prioritize the Impact of Different Units of an Electricity Distribution Company in the Supply Chain (Case Study of Yazd Electricity Distribution Company). Second International Conference on Challenges and New Solutions in Industrial Engineering, Management and Accounting. [In Persian]
Maleki, Lotfi, Pouria, Shahraki Shahabadi, & Ahmadi. (2021). Potential assessment of solar farms using multi-criteria decision-making methods in Iran. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 40(3), 251-271. [In Persian]
Manzoor, Davoud Manzoor and Rahimi, Alireza (2015). Prioritizing power generation plants in Iran using multi-attribute decision-making models, Iranian Energy Economics Research Journal, Year 4, Issue 14. [In Persian]
Omidian, Mojtaba and Heydarieh, Seyed Abdullah (2018), Prioritizing supply chain strategy in electricity generation using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Second International Conference on Management and Business. [In Persian]
Patel, Rakesh Kumar, and Ravi K. Dwivedi. Determination of Critical Component Failure in Thermal Power Station by Using Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 20 (2020): 353-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-00835-8
Pourjavad, Sasan, Khoshab, Sepideh; Farahgol, Pouria and Rezaei, Ghasem. (2012). Assessment of supply chain risk factors using the fuzzy AHP method (case study: Dalaho Power Plant), Amad Scientific Journal, Volume 20, Number 79.[In Persian]
Singh, D. P., Abhishake Chaudhary, and Vijayant Maan. Selection of heat exchanger for heat operation by multiple attribute decision making (MADM) approach. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology 2.10 (2013): 3072-3080.
Taylan, Osman, et al. Assessment of energy systems using extended fuzzy AHP, fuzzy VIKOR, and TOPSIS approaches to manage non-cooperative opinions. Sustainability 12.7 (2020): 2745.
Zare, Kazem, Javad Mehri-Tekmeh, and Sepideh Karimi. A SWOT framework for analyzing the electricity supply chain using an integrated AHP methodology combined with fuzzy-TOPSIS. International strategic management review 3.1-2 (2015): 66-80.
 
Volume 14, Issue 55
Spring 2025
Pages 79-112

  • Receive Date 24 September 2024
  • Revise Date 04 May 2025
  • Accept Date 06 May 2025
  • First Publish Date 06 May 2025
  • Publish Date 22 June 2025