Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Ph.D. in Economics, Assistant Professor, Larestan University, Larestan, Iran

Abstract

Due to the importance of economic relations and environmental potential issues, the relationship between economic growth and environmental degradation is a very important issue. Therefore, understanding the relationship between GDP growth, consumption and extraction of fossil fuels, use of renewable energy, and  emissions in the Iranian economy are very important for sustainable development. In this study, we try to investigate how  emissions (as the main cause of pollution) are affected by per capita income growth, innovation, renewable energy consumption, and extraction from non-renewable energy resources in a model with four equations (for Iran in period 1979 to 2019). By reviewing the wide range of studies, the framework developed in this paper has not been investigated in domestic or international studies. On the other hand, in this research, for estimating nonlinear simultaneous equations, the multi-objective optimization method and its application for estimating simultaneous equations in econometrics have been developed. (This method can be a way to estimate nonlinear simultaneous equations in future studies). The results showed innovation activities have not been able to have a significant effect on reducing pollution emissions for the Iranian economy. Also, we found out the consumption of renewable energy has not had a significant effect on reducing pollution emissions. Also, the existence of the Kuznets environmental hypothesis was confirmed and Iran is in the upward part of this curve.

Keywords

Main Subjects

استادزاد، علی حسین و ابراهیم هادیان (2017). تحلیل تصادفی روند منابع قابل استخراج نفت و گاز در ایران 1410-1359. فصلنامه مطالعات اقتصاد انرژی، سال 12، شماره 51، صفحات32-1.
استادزاد، علی حسین و پریسا بهلولی (1394). تاثیر انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر بر منحنی زیست محیطی کوزنتسی در ایران. فصلنامه علمی نظریه‌های کاربردی اقتصاد، سال 2، شماره 2، صفحات 154-127.
اسلاملوئیان کریم و علی حسین استادزاد (1395). برآورد تابع تولید مناسب برای ایران با وجود نهاده انرژی و تحقیق و توسعه: روش الگوریتم ژنتیک. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه پایدار، سال ۱۶، شماره ۱، صفحات 48-21.
دانشوری، سمیه و سلاطین، پروانه و خلیل زاده، محمد (2020).تاثیر انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر بر اقتصاد سبز. فصلنامه علوم و تکنولوژی محیط زیست، سال 21، شماره 12، صفحات 179-165.
صادقی، سید کمال و سجودی، سکینه و احمدزاده دلجوان، فهیمه (۱۳۹۶). تأثیر انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر بر رشد اقتصادی وکیفیت محیط‌زیست در ایران. فصلنامه پژوهش‌های سیاست گذاری وبرنامه ریزی انرژی، سال ۳، شماره ۱، صفحات 202-171.
مجدزاده، مطهره السادات (۱۳۹۴).بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر تقاضای انرژی در ایران و رتبه‌بندی سهم هریک از آنها مبتنی بر رویکرد میانگین‌گیری بیزینی. فصلنامه مطالعات اقتصاد انرژی، سال ۱۱، شماره ۴۴، صفحات 152-125.
مولایی، محمد و ابوریحان، انتظار (2019). عوامل مؤثر بر تقاضای انرژی فسیلی در بخش صنعت ایران. فصلنامه مطالعات اقتصادی کاربردی ایران، سال 8، شماره 30، صفحات 177-193.
Abid, M. (2017). Does economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental quality? A comparative analysis of EU and MEA countries. Journal of environmental management, No. 188, pp. 183-194.
Ahmad, M. and S. I. Khattak (2020). Is Aggregate Domestic Consumption Spending (ADCS) Per Capita Determining CO2 Emissions in South Africa? A New Perspective. Environmental and Resource Economics, No. 34, pp. 1-24.
Ahmad, M., Khan, Z., Rahman, Z. U., Khattak, S. I., and Khan, Z. U. (2019). Can innovation shocks determine CO2 emissions (CO2e) in the OECD economies? A new perspective. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, No. 32, pp. 1-21.
Albino, V., Ardito, L., Dangelico, R. M., and Petruzzelli, A. M. (2014). Understanding the development trends of low-carbon energy technologies: A patent analysis. Applied Energy, No. 135, pp. 836-854.
Aldieri, L., Bruno, B., and Vinci, C. P. (2019). Does environmental innovation make us happy? An empirical investigation. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, No. 67, pp. 166-172.
Apergis, N. and I. Ozturk (2015). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecological Indicators, No. 52, pp. 16-22.
Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C. S., ... and Pimentel, D. (1996). Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Environment and Development Economics, No. 1(1), pp. 104-110.
Azevedo, V. G., Sartori, S., and Campos, L. M. (2018). CO2 emissions: A quantitative analysis among the BRICS nations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, No. 81, pp. 107-115.
Baek, J. (2015). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: the case of Arctic countries. Energy Economics, No. 50, pp. 13-17.
Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., and Zhang, J. W. (2019). Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Science of the Total Environment, No. 678, pp. 632-638.
Brandão Santana, N., et al. (2015). Technological innovation for sustainable development: an analysis of different types of impacts for countries in the BRICS and G7 groups. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, No. 22(5), pp. 425-436
Charfeddine, L. and M. Kahia (2019). Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: A panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis. Renewable energy, No. 139, pp. 198-213
Cheng, C., Ren, X., and Wang, Z. (2019). The impact of renewable energy and innovation on carbon emission: an empirical analysis for OECD countries. Energy Procedia, No. 158, pp. 3506-3512.
De Groot, H. L., Withagen, C. A., and Minliang, Z. (2004). Dynamics of China's regional development and pollution: an investigation into the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Environment and development economics, No. 9(4), pp. 507-537.
Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological economics, No. 49(4), pp. 431-455.
Figueirôa, S. F., Good, G. A., and Peyerl, D. (Eds.). (2019). History, Exploration and Exploitation of Oil and Gas. Springer International Publishing.
Grossman, G. M. and A. B. Krueger (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The quarterly journal of economics, No. 110(2), pp. 353-377.
Halicioglu, F., and Ketenci, N. (2018). Output, renewable and non-renewable energy production, and international trade: Evidence from EU-15 countries. Energy, No. 159, pp. 995-1002.
Huaman, R. N. E. and T. X. Jun (2014). Energy related CO2 emissions and the progress on CCS projects: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, No. 31, pp. 368-385.
Ito, K. (2017). CO2 emissions, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, and economic growth: Evidence from panel data for developing countries. International Economics, No. 151, pp. 1-6.
Kadafa, A. (2012) Oil exploration and spillage in the Niger Delta of Nigeria. Civil and Environmental Research, No. 2 (3), pp. 38-51.
Kaika, D. and E. Zervas (2013). The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory – Part A: Concept, causes and the CO2 emissions case. Energy policy, No. 62, pp. 1392-1402.
Konak, A., Coit, D. W., and Smith, A. E. (2006). Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, No. 91(9), pp. 992-1007.
Kraft, J. and A. Kraft (1978). On the relationship between energy and GNP. The Journal of Energy and Development, No. 12, pp. 401-403.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American economic review, No. 45(1), pp. 1-28.
Lin, B. and M. Y. Raza (2019). Analysis of energy related CO2 emissions in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, No. 219, pp. 981-993.
Moutinho, V., Varum, C., and Madaleno, M. (2017). How economic growth affects emissions? An investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve in Portuguese and Spanish economic activity sectors. Energy Policy, No. 106, pp. 326-344.
Orubu, C. O. and D. G. Omotor (2011). Environmental quality and economic growth: Searching for environmental Kuznets curves for air and water pollutants in Africa. Energy policy, No. 39(7), pp. 4178-4188.
Rahman, Z. U. and M. Ahmad (2019). Modeling the relationship between gross capital formation and CO 2 (a) symmetrically in the case of Pakistan: an empirical analysis through NARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, No. 26(8), pp. 8111-8124.
Raiser, K., Naims, H., and Bruhn, T. (2017). Corporatization of the climate? Innovation, intellectual property rights, and patents for climate change mitigation. Energy research and social science, No. 27, pp. 1-8.
Sadorsky, P. (2009). Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energy policy, No. 37(10), pp. 4021-4028.
SUN, Y.-j. and C. LIN (2018). Study on the Relationship between Environmental Regulation and the Quality of China's Economic Growth -A Perspective Based on Environmental Kuznets Curve. Shanghai Journal of Economics, No. 3, pp. 9-32.
Swart, J. and L. Brinkmann (2020). Economic Complexity and the Environment: Evidence from Brazil. Universities and Sustainable Communities: Meeting the Goals of the Agenda 2030, Springer.
van der Ploeg, F. (2018). Political economy of dynamic resource wars. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, No. 92, pp. 765-782.
Xu, R., Chou, L. C., and Zhang, W. H. (2019). The effect of CO2 emissions and economic performance on hydrogen-based renewable production in 35 European Countries. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, No. 44(56), pp. 29418-29425.
Yii, K.-J. and C. Geetha (2017). The nexus between technology innovation and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: evidence from granger causality test. Energy Procedia, No. 105, pp. 3118-3124.
Yu, Y. and Y. Du (2019). Impact of technological innovation on CO2 emissions and emissions trend prediction on ‘New Normal’economy in China. Atmospheric Pollution Research, No. 10(1), pp. 152-161.
Zheng, K., Yang, R. J., Xu, H., and Hu, J. (2017). A new distribution metric for comparing Pareto optimal solutions. Structural and multidisciplinary Optimization, No. 55(1), pp. 53-62.
Zoundi, Z. (2017). CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, No. 72, pp. 1067-1075.