• سیاستگذاریهای اقتصادی و مالی در حوزههای فوقالذکر در سطوح ملی، منطقهای و جهانی
Ali Ghadamyari; Mohammad mahdi Hajian
Abstract
The development of Underground Gas Storage (UGS) in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs has always been a priority for industrialized countries. This is mainly because UGS helps in balancing the seasonal supply and demand of gas, managing reservoirs efficiently over time, ensuring the security of gas supply, ...
Read More
The development of Underground Gas Storage (UGS) in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs has always been a priority for industrialized countries. This is mainly because UGS helps in balancing the seasonal supply and demand of gas, managing reservoirs efficiently over time, ensuring the security of gas supply, and fulfilling international contractual obligations. Providing a legal platform and an attractive contract model is crucial to encourage private sector participation in this strategic industry and accelerate UGS development. Concession arrangements are one of the most commonly used and attractive models for UGS development. However, the main question of this research is whether the use of concessional agreements faces any legal prohibitions. To answer this question, the legal challenges facing the application of this contractual model in the oil fields development have been investigated. In this regard, the research verifies whether this industry is upstream or downstream from the legal point of view, and considers the opinions of prominent jurists. After analyzing the unique features of the storage industry, the essential differences between UGS and the traditional development of oil fields, and especially the governmental ownership of the gas that is injected, the conclusion is that the use of concession agreements is allowed
Seyed Nasrullah Ebrahimi Seyed Nasrullah Ebrahimi; muhamad shyryjyan
Volume 3, Issue 10 , April 2014, , Pages 1-39
Abstract
This paper deals with the process of developments in upstream oil and gas contracts during 1979-1991 and 1992-2013. We will understand that any type of conventional contracts had not been concluded during 1979-1991 but in the latter period, three generations of Iranian service contracts named, “Buy-Back ...
Read More
This paper deals with the process of developments in upstream oil and gas contracts during 1979-1991 and 1992-2013. We will understand that any type of conventional contracts had not been concluded during 1979-1991 but in the latter period, three generations of Iranian service contracts named, “Buy-Back Contracts” have been designed and implemented. Due to the necessity of designing new upstream contracts we intend to analyze that which of the conventional upstream contracts are compatible with the current sovereignty laws of oil and gas industry? Regarding the dominant regulations on this sector, what are the concerns and proposal framework of experts about the new contracts? Finally, it seems that the dominant legal requirements on oil and gas upstream sector with the principles of Buy-Back contracts are more convenient than other types of conventional contracts. Of course, the new contracts regarding the current legal capabilities, should be both the ability of answering to concerns of critics as well as suitable flexibility in terms of oil and gas fields of the country.
