Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD . Department of Civil Engineering, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran

2 Assistant Professor Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr Branch, Iran

3 Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr Branch, Iran

Abstract

Today, energy supply is one of the most important axes of the strategy of different countries due to its vital role in the continuation of technological and economic development of countries. The Petroleum industry, as one of the most important industries producing energy, has become an important and special industry due to the complexities of its production and extraction. Therefore, classification and prioritization of changes have taken place, and presenting a model of how to deal with changes can play an important and fundamental role in managing changes in executive projects. Of course, no project can completely eliminate the risk of change, but it can be largely prevented by identifying the underlying causes of change.
In this study, an attempt has been made to compile a study and present a questionnaire and interview with experts and specialists in the oil industry, information, and existing records, which resulted in finding 20 of the most effective changes in EPC projects in the field of the petroleum industry. For this purpose, after reviewing and analyzing the changes, the model of dealing with the changes in EPC projects is presented and then according to the main parts of EPC projects, the most effective cases of each part are determined by using multi-criteria decision-making methods consisting of series. Analysis Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Gray Relationship Analysis (GRA) have been proposed to provide a change management structure in EPC projects in the oil industry. Based on the obtained results, it was found that the design and engineering (E) phase has the greatest impact on the changes made in EPC projects, followed by the manufacturing and construction (C) and procurement (P) phases. This research could be useful for prioritizing and managing change and minimizing the impact of unintended changes on EPC projects in the petroleum industry

Keywords

Main Subjects

 
Kabirfar, K. and Mojtahedi, M. (2019).The impact of [Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) Phases on Project Performance.  Buildings, Vol. 9 (1), 15 https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9010015.
Martens, M.L. and Carvalho, M.M. (2017). Key factors of sustainability in project Management context: A survey exploring the project Managers’ perspective. Int. J. Proj. Manage, Vol. 35, pp. 1084-1102.
Joslin, R.  and Müller, R. (2016). The relationship between project governance and project success. Int. J. Proj. Manage, Vol. 34, pp. 613-626.
Olanrewaju, A.L. and Abdul-Aziz, A.-R. (2015). Building maintenance processes, principles, procedures, practices and strategies Springer: Singapore, Building Maintenance Processes. DOI:10.1007/978-981-287-263-0-10
Oakland, J.  and Marosszeky, M. (2017). Total Construction Management: Lean Quality in Construction Project Delivery Routledge. Abington, UK. ISBN 9781138908543, Published February 16, 2017 by Routledge, 634 Pages
Tommelein, I.D. (2015). Journey toward lean construction: Pursuing a paradigm shift in the aec industry. J. Construct. Eng. Manage, Vol.141, 04015005.
Edwin, H.W. (2006). Dispute resolution management for international construction Projects in China. Management Decision, Vol.7, pp.589-602.
Vidogah, W. and Ndekugri, I. (1997). Improving the management of claim. Contractors’ Perspective. Journal of Management in Engineering, OH University, Vol. 13, pp. 23-28.
Heravi.A. (2013). Cause of claims incidence in urban project contracts, MSc. Thesis. School of Civil Engineering, Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Abrahimi, N. and Farahani, M. and Sheikh, J. (2015). Pathology of claim management process in design and Build contracts: the case study of oil contracts Sixth International Conference on Project Management, Istanboul, Turkey.
Chou, J.-S. Irawan, N. Pham, A.-D. Project Management knowledge of construction professionals: Cross-country study of effects on project success. J. Construct. Eng. Manage. 2013, 139, 04013015.
Demirkesen, S.  and Ozorhon, B. (2017). Impact of integration Management on construction project Management efficiency. J. Proj. Manage, Vol. 35, pp.1639-1654.
Zeng, S.  and Ma, H.  and Lin, H.  Zeng, R. and Tam, V.W. (2004). Social responsibility of major infrastructure projects in china.Int. J. Proj. Manage, Vol.33, pp. 537-548.
Mubarak, S.A. (2015). Construction Project Scheduling and Control John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA,
Pophalie, M. (2011). Causes of cost overrun in construction. IOSR J. Eng., Vol.4, pp.1-7.
Lin and Hsu, M. (2003). Fuzzy assessment model to estimate the probability of delay in Turkish construction projects. J. Manage. Eng., Vol.31, 04014055.
Ma, A.A. (2016). Exploring delay causes of road construction projects in Egypt. Alex. Eng. J., Vol. 55, pp.1515-1539.
Lu and Liu, R. (2018 a). acute toxicity bioassay of mercuric chloride: an alien fish from a river. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry. Vol.92, pp.169-173.
Julong Deng, JD. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex world, McGraw-Hill, NewYork, US.
Davis, K. A. (2016). method to measure success dimensions relating to individual stakeholder groups. Int. J. Proj. Manag., Vol. 34, pp. 480-493.